1pt4 | Matt Alofs

index

Two from a roll of Delta 400 stand developed in Rodinal


M6TTL, 50 Hex, Delta 400 @ 200, Rodinal Stand
M6TTL, 50 Hex, Delta 400 @ 200, Rodinal Stand

Not bad, not bad at all. Same process as the XP2. Turned out a bit grainier. More to come.

4 Comments

  1. Simon says:

    Hi Matt

    I’ve been reading your stand development posts with interest. The results look good… In the XP2 process you mention leaving the film to develop for “approximately” one hour, I just wondered how approximate you were being and whether 54 mins might be near enough or is it closer to 58 etc…? Guess I’m just curious about how much accuracy is required?!

    Cheers Simon

  2. matt says:

    Simon,

    You can read approximately in this case as, ‘well, surely that’s at least been an hour.’ I think I’ve been running close to 65 or 70 minutes, but I don’t think it really matters that much. I think the developer is probably all exhausted before the hour is up, so that extra bit of time likely does little, a bit like leaving film in Diafine B for longer than 5 minutes.

  3. Ron says:

    Matt,

    I’ve been playing with stand development myself. My latest “find” has been running TMY-2 in Rodinal 1+100 x 45min. That includes 4 inversions per min for the first three minutes then nothing thereafter. You can see a couple of examples on my flickr page.

  4. matt says:

    Ron, looks good. The new TMY seems to be good stuff.